On appeal, the DOJ asked the Second Circuit to rule on whether a foreign person who does not reside in the US and is not otherwise a “covered person” under the FCPA may nevertheless be liable for conspiring or aiding and abetting a US company to violate the FCPA . The court concluded that charges premised on conspiracy or aiding and abetting theories cannot be used to extend liability beyond the categories of covered persons defined in the statute. The decision left open the question whether Lawrence Hoskins, a UK national employed by the French company Alstom S.A. outside of the US, could be held liable under the FCPA because he is deemed to have acted as an agent of a domestic concern, Alstom’s US entity.
August 24, 2018
Second Circuit rules on scope of FCPA jurisdiction
Related by Topic
BIT Mining settles with DOJ and SEC to resolve FCPA violations, while former CEO faces bribery-related charges
November 21, 2024
News Alert
Son of former Comptroller General of Ecuador pleads guilty in Odebrecht bribery scandal
November 19, 2024
News Alert
Venezuela-based subsidiary of global telecommunications operator resolves FCPA investigation
November 13, 2024
News Alert