The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that, under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14/1 et seq.)(“BIPA”), an aggrieved party need not allege any actual injury or adverse effect in order to have a right of action under the statute. The ruling will allow the plaintiff, a minor whose thumbprint was obtained by Six Flags Great America amusement park in 2014 as part of the park entry process, and has been stored by Six Flags ever since, to move forward with his case. BIPA confers standing on individuals who are aggrieved by a violation of the statute, which requires private entities to obtain written consent and provide notice of the purpose and duration of retention prior to collecting a person’s biometric identifiers or biometric information.
January 25, 2019
Illinois Supreme Court rules that no actual injury is necessary for standing in biometrics case
Related by Topic
Cash App agrees to pay $375,000 to resolve allegations that it failed to adequately protect customer data
October 7, 2025
News Alert
Tractor Supply Company reaches historic $1.35 million settlement with privacy regulator in California
October 3, 2025
News Alert
Data Privacy Litigation Trends Against Insurers and Financial Services Companies
October 2, 2025
Insight