A District Judge found Anna Machkevitch guilty for failing to provide documents requested by the Serious Fraud Office. Machkevitch, who was not a suspect in the investigation, refused to supply all documents requested by the SFO during its investigation into suspected fraud, bribery and corruption at the Eurasian Natural Resources Company. The SFO is investigating the now-defunct ENRC and its founders, including Anna Machkevitch’s father Alexander, for suspected bribery in connection with mining rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Judge John Zani held that Machkevitch’s refusal to produce the requested documents constituted a violation of Section 2 (3) of the Criminal Justice Act 1987. As a result, Machkevitch must pay a fine of £800, a victim surcharge of £181, and all costs incurred by the SFO.
January 31, 2020
Machkevitch receives guilty verdict for Section 2 non-compliance
Related by Topic
New Post
The EU’s Omnibus Package introduces substantial changes to EU sustainability legislation including the CSRD and CSDDD
May 6, 2025
Insight
New Post
Indonesia-based PT Telkom discloses two U.S. investigations, including an FCPA inquiry
May 1, 2025
News Alert
New Post
Merit Medical Systems discloses SEC inquiry into its China-based subsidiary
May 1, 2025
News Alert