On appeal, the DOJ asked the Second Circuit to rule on whether a foreign person who does not reside in the US and is not otherwise a “covered person” under the FCPA may nevertheless be liable for conspiring or aiding and abetting a US company to violate the FCPA . The court concluded that charges premised on conspiracy or aiding and abetting theories cannot be used to extend liability beyond the categories of covered persons defined in the statute. The decision left open the question whether Lawrence Hoskins, a UK national employed by the French company Alstom S.A. outside of the US, could be held liable under the FCPA because he is deemed to have acted as an agent of a domestic concern, Alstom’s US entity.
August 24, 2018
Second Circuit rules on scope of FCPA jurisdiction
Related by Topic
White House Issues Executive Order “Pausing” FCPA Enforcement—But Beware
February 14, 2025
Insight
Attorney General Bondi’s Opening Salvo: Implications for FCPA and Beyond
February 6, 2025
Insight
DOJ announces transfer of more than $50 million in forfeited corruption proceeds to Nigerian government
January 16, 2025
News Alert